#Goat hides skin

Phenotypic correlation estimates among studied traits ranged from +0.4 for physicalĬharacteristics of leather with weight and area to +0.9 among weight, area, and thickness of skin and leather. Samples taken parallel to the backbone had significantly (P < 0.0001) higher force and strength (31.2 � 0.7 kg, 314.3 � 4.3 kg force/cm2) than perpendicular samples (23.4�0.7 kg, 241.9�4.3 kg force/cm2), although they showed smaller (P<0.0001) percentage extension (59.9 � 0.9, 68.4 � 0.9%). The skin form hip, top shoulder, and back regions had highest thickness, followed by the rib and belt. The region of sampling had significant (P < 0.0001) effects on physical properties of goat leather. Leather from adult goats had significantly higher values for breaking force (29.6�0.7 vs 26.5�0.8 kg P = 0.001) and percentage extension (66.6 � 0.9 vs 62.9 � 1.0% P = 0.006), but tensile strength was not significantly different (283.6� 5.1 vs 276.4 � 5.1 kg force/cm2 P = 0.3). Adult goats had significantly heavier (P < 0.0001) skins and leather with greater (P < 0.0001) area and greater (P = 0.0006–< 0.0001) leather thickness at all sites measured than kids. Male goats had significantly (P< 0.0001) heavier skins (1288�26.4 vs 804�23.3 g) with greater area (49.2 � 0.9 vs 35.3 � 0.9 dm2) and greater thickness at all sites measured than females. There were no type effects on leather weight (P = 0.3), area or dimension (P = 0.6–0.1), breaking force (P= 0.8), or tensile strength (P= 0.06). Cashmere goat leather had significantly higher values for thickness (1.01�0.01 vs 0.96�0.01 mm P= 0.05) and percentage extension (66.4�0.9 vs 63.1�0.9% P = 0.04) than hairy goat leather. There were significant differences between hairy and cashmere goats for skin area (43.7�0.9 and 41.8�0.9dm2 P= 0.04). Goat skins (200: males n = 80, and females n = 120) of two age groups (<1 year, n = 80 and 1–5 years, n = 120) representing two genotypes (hairy and cashmere) were used. Hides from countries where anthrax is common may pose a higher risk of exposure to anthrax than hides originating from the United States.This study evaluated the potential of two goat types (hairy and cashmere) for quality and quantity of skin and There is no risk linked to handling the hides of healthy animals, or drums made from the hides of healthy animals. It is important to talk to your provider about any recent contact you’ve had with animal hide drums.

If you are an animal hide drum owner or player, or if you recently attended a drumming event and are experiencing any symptoms that resemble anthrax, you should get medical care as soon as possible. While a recent case of gastrointestinal anthrax was identified in a person who attended an indoor drumming event, this case is still currently under investigation and the way the person became infected with anthrax has not been determined. The risk of being exposed to anthrax spores by attending drumming events is also considered to be very low.

Goat hides